08.27.18

Tax Connections Newsletter – Summer 2018
Robert Swenson

Tax Cost of Divorce Set to Rise in 2019

If you are divorced or in the process of divorcing, it is imperative to understand how the Tax Cuts and Jobs Act affects the tax treatment of alimony. For most couples, the tax cost of divorce will go up next year.

What is changing?

Under current rules, a taxpayer who pays alimony is entitled to a deduction for payments made during the year. The deduction is above-the-line, which is a big advantage, because there is no need to itemize. The payments are included in the recipient spouse’s gross income.

The TCJA essentially reverses the tax treatment of alimony, effective for divorce or separation instruments executed after 2018. In other words, starting next year, new alimony arrangements will no longer be deductible by the payer and will be excluded from the recipient’s gross income.

Existing divorce or separation instruments, including those executed during the remainder of 2018, are not affected. Current rules apply even if an instrument is modified after 2018 (unless the modification expressly provides that TCJA rules apply).

What is  the impact?

The TCJA will likely cause alimony awards to decrease for post-2018 divorces or separations. Paying spouses will argue that, without the benefit of the alimony deduction, they cannot afford to pay as much as they could under current rules. The ability of recipients to exclude alimony from income will at least partially offset the decrease, but many recipients will be worse off under the new rules.

For example, let’s say John and Lori are divorcing in 2018. Lori is in the 35% federal income tax bracket and John is a stay-at-home dad who cares for the couple’s two children. The court orders Lori to pay John $100,000 per year in alimony. Lori is entitled to deduct the payments, so the after-tax cost to her is $65,000. Presuming John qualifies to file as head of household and the children qualify for the full child tax credit, John’s federal tax on the alimony payments is approximately $8,600, leaving him with $91,400 in after-tax income.

Suppose, instead, that John and Lori divorce in 2019. Lori argues that, without the alimony deduction, the most she can afford to pay is $65,000, and the court agrees. The payments are tax-free to John, but he is still left with $26,400 less than he would have received under pre-TCJA rules.

The current rules essentially shift income recognition from the paying spouse to the recipient, reducing the couple’s overall tax liability (assuming the recipient is in a lower tax bracket). The new rules eliminate this tax advantage. Of course, in the event that the recipient is in a higher tax bracket than the payer (an uncommon, but not impossible situation), a couple is better off under the new rules.

What if you are already divorced?

The new rules will not affect existing divorce or separation instruments, even if they are modified after 2018. However, spouses who would benefit from the TCJA rules — because their relative income levels have changed — may voluntarily apply them if the modification expressly provides for such treatment.

Act quickly before the end of the year

If you are initiating a divorce or separation and would benefit from the alimony deduction, act quickly to ensure that it is finalized before the end of the year. If you are already divorced or separated, determine whether you would benefit by applying the new rules to your alimony payments. If you would, a modification of your divorce or separation instrument may be in order.

For more information, contact Rob Swenson at rswenson@orba.com, or call him at 312.670.7444. Visit ORBA.com to learn more about our Tax Services.
©2018


C Corporation Versus Pass-Through: What’s the right structure for your business?

The recent corporate tax cut has many pass-through business owners rethinking their choice of entity. The Tax Cuts and Jobs Act (TCJA) slashed the federal corporate income tax rate to a flat rate of 21% from a top rate of 35% and eliminated the corporate alternative minimum tax (AMT). Meanwhile, owners of pass-through entities — partnerships, S corporations and LLCs — are taxed on their shares of business income at individual rates as high as 37% (down from 39.6%).

At first blush, it seems that the corporate form offers a substantial tax advantage. Why pay tax at a 37% rate when you can enjoy a 21% tax rate on the same income? Unfortunately, it is not that simple. Let’s review some of the factors to consider in determining whether organizing your business as a C corporation would reduce your overall tax burden.

What’s your true pass-through rate?

Although the top individual income tax rate is 37%, a pass-through owner’s true tax rate may be higher or lower, depending on his or her circumstances. For example, an owner who does not materially participate in the business may be subject to an additional 3.8% net investment income tax (NIIT).

Also, the TCJA created a new pass-through deduction, which allows owners of certain pass-through entities to deduct up to 20% of their share of qualified business income (QBI) through 2025. The deduction is subject to a variety of limitations and exclusions, depending on the nature of the business and the income levels of its owners. But, assuming that a pass-through owner qualifies for the full deduction and that all of his or her income from the business is QBI, the owner’s actual pass-through rate will be approximately 29.6%.

What about double taxation?

Even with the benefit of the pass-through deduction, a pass-through entity’s effective tax rate is higher than the 21% corporate tax rate. But, it is also necessary to consider whether a C corporation’s effective tax rate is increased by double taxation. If a C corporation distributes its earnings to its owners in the form of dividends, that income is taxed twice — once at the corporate level at the 21% rate and again at the individual shareholder level at rates as high as 23.8% (the 20% qualified dividend rate for high-income taxpayers plus the 3.8% NIIT). Double taxation results in an effective tax rate in excess of the top 37% bracket for individuals.

Some C corporations can defer double taxation by paying out earnings to owners in the form of salaries and benefits or by reinvesting earnings in the business. Note, however, that the accumulated earnings tax (AET) and the tax on personal holding companies (PHCs) may erase the benefits of retaining corporate earnings under certain circumstances.

What’s your exit strategy?

Even if a business is able to operate as a C corporation without distributing its earnings, doing so merely defers double taxation rather than avoiding it altogether. If the business assets are sold, the sale proceeds will be taxed at the corporate level and then again when distributed to the shareholders. If the owners contemplate a sale of the business assets in the near term, a pass-through entity may be preferable. If the eventual sale of stock is anticipated, a C corporation may be preferable.

What if the TCJA is repealed or modified?

Although the 21% corporate tax rate is characterized as a permanent change, that just means that the rate is not scheduled to expire or sunset in 2026, like many of the TCJA’s individual income tax provisions. However, that does not mean Congress will not repeal or modify some or all of the TCJA’s corporate provisions down the road.

It is important to consider the possibility that the corporate tax rate will be increased in the future. If you organize your business as a C corporation or convert an existing pass-through entity into a C corporation and the advantages of C corporation status are eliminated, converting back to pass-through status may prove to be cost prohibitive.

Will you benefit?

Determining whether your business would benefit by operating as a C corporation is a complex process that depends on a variety of tax and nontax factors (see the Sidebar). Generally speaking, C corporation status may be appropriate if 1) your business does not plan to distribute earnings; 2) retaining earnings does not raise AET or PHC tax concerns; 3) your owners are ineligible for the pass-through deduction; 4) you do not intend to sell the business in the coming years; and 5) you do not expect the TCJA to be repealed or substantially modified in the foreseeable future.

Sidebar: Other considerations

The main article discusses some, but by no means all, of the factors you should consider in determining the ideal structure for your business. Here are some other factors to consider:

  • Pass-through entities offer greater flexibility to allocate profit and loss according to criteria other than ownership interests;
  • Unlike C corporations, pass-through entities are able to pass business losses to their owners;
  • Owners of pass-through entities may be able to command a higher purchase price because the buyer obtains a stepped-up basis in the company’s assets;
  • For certain types of businesses, such as real estate firms, a partnership or limited liability company is the entity of choice for various tax and non-tax reasons; and
  • Pass-through entities may be better suited for certain estate planning techniques.

Finally, do not overlook the impact of state taxes on your choice of entity.

For more information, contact Rob Swenson at rswenson@orba.com, or call him at 312.670.7444. Visit ORBA.com to learn more about our Tax Services.
©2018

view all

Firms News

09.12.18

ORBA Welcomes New Hires to Tax, Audit and Human Resources
Ostrow Reisin Berk & Abrams, Ltd. (ORBA), one of Chicago’s largest public accounting firms, is pleased to welcome Joshua Goldschmidt and Joshua Rincy to its Tax Department, Roxana Stupar to its Audit Department, and Andrew J. Butkus, Jr., PHR to its Human Resources Department as an HR Specialist/Recruiter.

view all

Media Mentions

09.13.18

Various Media – ORBA Welcomes New Hires to Audit, Tax, HR

Guides

ORBA will gladly provide you with hard copies of the useful guides listed below. Select which guides you would like to receive and submit the form below.

  • Tax Pocket Guide
  • Tax Planning Guide
  • Records Retention Schedule
  • Auto, Travel & Business Log

request guide

Close
Forward Thinking
Forward Thinking